Roughly four thousand, two hundred and twenty-seven Trump-era news cycles ago, there was a rather famous book called “Fire and Fury.” The author, Michael Wolff, used an interesting tactic to gain access to the Trump White House: He allowed his subjects, the president included, to believe that he was going to write a positive account of the Trump administration, and then used that access to produce an account of an administration in constant chaos, and a president who was understood by everyone around him to be unfit for the job.
One way to approach the Mueller report, if your sense of civic duty requires you to approach it, is to see it as a more rigorous, capacious version of “Fire and Fury.” Mueller's exposé was backed by subpoena power rather than just sweet talk, but ultimately it delivers the same general portrait: Donald Trump as an amoral incompetent surrounded by grifters, misfits and his own overpromoted children, who is saved from self-destruction by advisers who sometimes decline to follow orders, and saved from high crimes in part by incompetence and weakness.
[Listen to “The Argument” podcast every Thursday morning, with Ross Douthat, Michelle Goldberg and David Leonhardt.]
Steve Bannon, Wolff’s most voluble source, came across as the smartest character in “Fire and Fury.” In the Mueller report a similar role is played by the former White House counsel Donald McGahn, who spoke at great length with investigators and ended up portrayed as the most effective of those save-him-from-himself advisers, using masterful inaction to frustrate Trump’s desire to sack the special counsel. And just as Trump railed against Bannon after Wolff’s book came out, he is now railing against McGahn, though in both cases it was his own decision (to allow Wolff White House access, to waive executive privilege and to allow aides to cooperate with Mueller) that made the revelations possible.
More broadly, just as Wolff’s unusual access ultimately produced a more dramatic version of a story that had already been told in piecemeal (and perhaps less fancifully) by White House reporters at the major newspapers, in the Mueller report we get a lot of confirmation of stories about White House dysfunction and dangerous presidential impulses that were published in, for instance, The New York Times.
But at the same time, the Mueller report also reaches roughly the same conclusion about the Russia-collusion story that “Fire and Fury” offered. Wolff wrote that while there might have been “side deals and freelance operations” by campaign hangers-on, “the idea of formal collusion and artful conspiracy … seemed unlikely to everybody in the White House … Bannon’s comment that the Trump campaign was not organized enough to collude with its own state organizations became everybody’s favorite talking point — not least because it was true.”
The disorganization point is key, because it is clear enough from events like the Trump Tower meeting that people around Trump were, shall we say, unencumbered by qualms about collusion. But the report makes the idea of an active, directed conspiracy — of the sort popularized by the Steele dossier, various faulty news reports and deep-state “experts” and the Resistance industry — seem as implausible as Wolff’s White House sources insisted.
Just to read the Mueller report’s paragraphs on the change to the G.O.P. convention platform on Ukraine, long a minor locus of Putin-Trump quid pro quo conspiracy theorizing, is sufficient to recognize how much freelancing and chaos dominated the Trump campaign, and how little direction was offered from above. Meanwhile, many of the larger loci of conspiracy, the alleged Michael Cohen Prague trip, the alleged Paul Manafort visit to Julian Assange, the bank server supposedly communicating between Trump Tower and Moscow, simply evanesce under the report’s scrutiny.
What remains offers useful detail about the Trump administration in the same way that “Fire and Fury” offered useful detail: It tells us more about what we already knew to be the case. The Mueller report is further proof that Trump has been as dishonest and ridiculous in the White House as he was on the campaign trail, further proof that his administration is filled with leakers, liars and people trying to protect their country from their boss and their boss from himself, further proof that our president postures as a strongman, yet is unable to master his own White House, further proof that left to his own devices Trump would constantly blunder into impeachable offenses.
But because it adds to a well-understood reality, the report will probably have the same modest political impact, the same limited media half-life as prior, less-extensive exposés, and we will be back to talking about whether Joe Biden can beat Bernie Sanders and whether Sanders can beat Trump.
And that shift will be sensible. Thanks to Robert Mueller, we know that Trump is about as bad as he appeared to be while running for the presidency — but not secretly omnicompetent, not secretly treasonous. He won in 2016 despite the manifold vices chronicled by Mueller’s team. The challenge for his opposition is to make him lose in 2020 because of them.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: email@example.com.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTOpinion) and Instagram, join the Facebook political discussion group, Voting While Female.B:
【看】【着】【海】【红】【珠】【终】【于】【走】【了】，【唐】【阮】【阮】【无】【奈】【的】【摇】【了】【摇】【头】。 【然】【后】【赶】【紧】【拿】【着】【饭】【盒】【出】【了】【门】，【骑】【着】【自】【行】【车】【一】【口】【气】【到】【了】【生】【技】【处】。 【停】【好】【自】【行】【车】，【唐】【阮】【阮】【一】【抬】【头】，【旁】【边】【的】【一】【亮】【自】【行】【车】【吸】【引】【了】【她】【的】【注】【意】。 【这】【是】【一】【辆】【紫】【罗】【兰】【色】【的】【进】【口】【自】【行】【车】。 【民】【间】【俗】【称】【凤】【头】。 【要】【知】【道】【现】【在】【国】【产】【的】【自】【行】【车】，【可】【都】【是】【黑】【色】【的】，【而】【且】【就】【算】【是】【女】【士】【的】【坤】【车】
【太】【后】【看】【不】【得】【卫】【皇】【后】【这】【副】【样】【子】，【她】【冷】【冷】【的】【皱】【起】【眉】【头】【咳】【嗽】【了】【一】【声】，【提】【醒】【卫】【皇】【后】【收】【起】【那】【副】【幸】【灾】【乐】【祸】【的】【嘴】【脸】。 【这】【个】【媳】【妇】【儿】【的】【确】【是】【沉】【不】【住】【气】。 【当】【初】【因】【为】【嘉】【平】【帝】【宠】【爱】【盛】【贵】【妃】【便】【对】【着】【嘉】【平】【帝】【眼】【睛】【不】【是】【眼】【睛】，【鼻】【子】【不】【是】【鼻】【子】【的】。 【两】【人】【生】【生】【的】【因】【为】【各】【种】【小】【事】【最】【后】【闹】【的】【不】【可】【开】【交】。 【现】【在】【好】【不】【容】【易】【有】【了】【一】【点】【儿】【起】【色】，【卫】【皇】【后】【却】【太】
【两】【人】【就】【如】【同】【两】【头】【饿】【狼】【一】【般】【不】【断】【地】【攻】【击】【着】【对】【方】，【找】【寻】【对】【方】【的】【弱】【点】，【以】【此】【来】【达】【到】【一】【击】【结】【束】【比】【赛】【的】【目】【的】，【但】【局】【面】【却】【变】【成】【了】【僵】【持】， 【岳】【天】【依】【稳】【扎】【稳】【打】，【打】【算】【就】【这】【样】【稳】【定】【地】【将】【局】【面】【维】【持】【下】【来】【的】【时】【候】，【手】【臂】【却】【突】【然】【一】【酸】，【竟】【然】【失】【去】【了】【力】【气】，【这】【让】【她】【有】【些】【惊】【恐】， 【可】【这】【一】【瞬】【也】【给】【了】【对】【方】【机】【会】，【下】【一】【秒】，【她】【便】【被】【对】【方】【用】【猴】【子】【爬】【树】【的】【方】【式】123马经彩图“【校】【长】，【谢】【谢】【您】！” “【校】【长】，【我】【那】【个】…【真】【不】【好】【意】【思】【啊】…” 【郭】【正】【浩】【收】【到】【了】【纪】【典】【的】【祝】【福】【后】【心】【里】【的】【担】【忧】【减】【轻】【了】【些】，【但】【是】【一】【想】【到】【自】【己】【放】【了】【自】【己】【上】【级】【领】【导】【的】【飞】【机】【就】【有】【点】【心】【里】【瑟】【瑟】【发】【抖】。 “【没】【事】【的】，【家】【人】【最】【重】【要】，【我】【能】【理】【解】，【那】【么】【郭】【老】【师】【你】【就】【先】【这】【样】【吧】，【去】【照】【顾】【一】【下】【你】【妻】【子】……” 【这】【个】【颁】【奖】【晚】【会】【也】【没】【有】【规】【定】【一】【定】【要】【有】
【北】【冥】【墨】【霆】【的】【手】【慢】【慢】【抬】【起】【来】【用】【沙】【哑】【的】【声】【音】【说】【道】：“【逸】【儿】，【父】【王】【求】【你】【一】【件】【事】【情】，【不】【要】【伤】【害】【邱】【泽】，【这】【一】【切】【都】【是】【我】【欠】【他】【的】。” 【北】【冥】【轩】【逸】【摇】【摇】【头】：“【父】【王】，【你】【没】【有】【做】【错】，【这】【些】【年】，【你】【一】【直】【都】【在】【保】【护】【邱】【泽】，【可】【邱】【泽】【却】【当】【做】【什】【么】【都】【不】【知】【道】。【他】【一】【直】【都】【恨】【着】【你】。” 【此】【时】【的】【苏】【小】【魅】【等】【人】【一】【同】【离】【开】，【屋】【内】【只】【剩】【下】【北】【冥】【轩】【逸】【与】【北】【冥】【墨】【霆】。
【洪】【荒】【世】【界】，【混】【沌】【虚】【空】。 【此】【时】【李】【耳】【已】【经】【回】【来】【百】【年】，【当】【李】【耳】【回】【来】【之】【时】，【整】【个】【洪】【荒】【世】【界】【的】【禁】【锢】【也】【已】【解】【除】，【整】【个】【天】【道】【虚】【无】【化】【身】【却】【是】【脱】【身】【了】【出】【来】。【对】【方】【也】【是】【地】【第】【时】【间】【斩】【了】【洪】【荒】【人】【道】【意】【识】，【这】【让】【李】【耳】【都】【有】【些】【来】【不】【及】【救】【援】。 【随】【后】【就】【是】【李】【耳】【和】【无】【道】【虚】【无】【化】【身】【的】【大】【战】，【李】【耳】【防】【止】【天】【道】【虚】【无】【化】【身】【破】【坏】【洪】【荒】，【也】【就】【一】【直】【向】【混】【沌】【深】【处】【而】。我认为念完上文，您应当会了解"123马经彩图"了吧？早已在上述文章为大伙儿作出了解读，坚信诸位看了以后应该可以弄懂呀